The Source

(by Dlanorrenrag*)

The Source:

A “universe-as-it-exists-in-itself” is an ineffable thing which, as its holistic self, can sponsor presentations, but cannot itself be represented. Yet, in representations, it can source the presentation of holographic perspectives, sensations, and consciousness of itself.

Each holographic presentation, as such, has an aspect of indivisibility in respect of the indivisibility of its sponsoring Source. Yet, each such holographic presentation will sponsor such sensations or appearances of divisibility as will be experienced or recorded as it discretely contacts, vibrates against, or intersects with others.

Each holographic presentation of various kinds or levels may come into, or be brought into, association with others, to various degrees or extents. Yet, all associate with expression and translation of feedback, sensation, sentience, or consciousness --- to some fluxing level or extent of being’ness and becoming’ness. In sum, they represent what I fondly refer to as a “flying spaghetti algorithm” --- or Allie Allah Algorithm (or “AlGor,” for short).

Depending upon level of association, various mathematical systems of representation may come to be shared among variously compatible holographies. Thus, at the level of human holography, we happen to share perceptions of such appearances of basic discrete quanta and forces as have facilitated the morphing into being’ness of our shared human capacity to appreciate perceptions of “physicality.”

However, such apparent quanta, forces, and physicality seem to be derivative of an aforesaid superior Source. The Source sponsors such variously interacting holographies of sensation as come to avail, at human level, our shared capacities to interpret ourselves as interacting among appearances, translations, or representations of our “physical reality.”

The “physical” result would be no different --- regardless of whether the Source-in-itself (and/or all said holographies) were “conscious-in-itself.”

In any event, it seems every meaningful holography must sponsor or be accompanied with some expression (or at least potential expression) of sensation, sentience, or consciousness. That is, at some level, consciousness seems necessarily to accompany, pervasively, all holographically presented representations of the Source.

All expressions of interaction seem to be systemically entangled to some level and/or extent, such that events seem to unfold within parameters in ways that are: not entirely indifferent, nor entirely empathetic; not entirely determined, nor entirely chosen.

That is, Empathetic Will seems pervasive, in that each observer seems to exert some effect, however minute or unpredictable, on his or her entire, entangled holography.

So: Is such a notion testable, rather than merely intuit-able or rationalize-able? It seems not. Does such a notion in any untoward way inhibit the “advance” of science? It seems not.

So: Why is such intuited extension of consciousness of interest? Because, it suggests or helps rationalize a moral basis for civilized, enlightened empathy.

So: Is enlightened empathy important? Well, to some of us, it seems so.

What about parsimony: A post-modern notion of “Allie-Allah-Algorithm” (Consciousness) does not violate, but advances, an aesthetic of parsimony. That is, it rationalizes a basis for moral empathy, yet attributes no unnecessary surplusage to “God.”

BTW --- Does AlGor seem more esoteric than string theory?

(And, given the rife ambiguity of our world, should we expect our Author to be other than ambiguous?)

***

NAME THAT TUNE: Of The Source, each person can call his or her own tune: For elegance, call for Allie Allah Algorithm; for tragedy-farce, call for Allah; for androgynous farce, call for Elohim; for farce-farce, call for Spaghetti Head; for absurdly indifferent farce, call for AlGor; for lovely-farce, call for Allie.