Practical Truth

(by Dlanorrenrag*)
Practical Truth As Effectively Willed Idealization:

Source of Will respects a logically proportioning synchronicity, such that, as one perspective of will associates algorithmically to leverage greater predictive power and control, other perspectives must adjust by falling subject to it. Thus do “physical laws of nature” come to phase and emerge into measurable manifestation.

Example:

Supercomputing using higher level mathematical algorithms associates with common idealization of such algorithms as discovering, proving, or establishing natural determinism, in superiority to free will.

On one hand, free will recedes in respect of increasing knowledge of mathematical determinism. On the other hand, such knowledge leverages power, and detecting how hypothetical defaults are otherwise determined makes such defaults amenable to alterations by detectors’ bringing of skills to bear at key pressure points.

INTUITION: Even given holographies of willful observers of super-mathematical computations, it remains intuitive that physics is inferior to mathematics, which is inferior to a system of perspectives of will, which is inferior to Source of Will (aka, God).

GODLY WILL: For Godly Will, truth is imagination, constrained only by an incomplete logic of predicate calculus. For Mortal Will, practical truth is constrained in respect of phasing and emerging laws of governments and of God. Otherwise, there would be no place for mortal free will. Thus, we enjoy freedom within laws, whose “truthiness” emerges in deference to phases of Source of Will.

Even were a far superior consciousness to have programmed or conditioned my consciousness in precisely controlled respect for empathetic stimuli, some incomplete, unprogrammed aspect of my programmer, however faint, would still permeate throughout the holography that defines parameters of my consciousness. Thus, God is always present for me, insofar as I happen to be inclined to be receptive.

At some loci or level, God is always expressing free will, always affecting us, and always availed to our vicarious receptivity. At some level, I and my holography operate, synchronously, in empathetic respect of Source of Will. In such respect, insofar as I have not Borg’d below the point of being receptive, I retain appreciation and purposeful hope.

MORTAL WILL: Although the quality of free will availed to mere mortals is not perfect freedom, no process of super computing can foreclose levels of parameters of possibilities in respect of which Perspectives of Will at each level of sensate-centrism are availed synchronous freedom. That is, no super-computer or physical set of hoops and bounds can objectify or foreclose all parameters of choice or of free will in order to assess or predetermine only one path of experience.

****

Fashioning Handles To Fit Practical Truths:

Procedure: Observe facts. Apply intuition to model facts. Test model, empirically and/or mathematically. Observe and confirm non-conforming facts. Apply intuition to refine or change model. Test new model. Observe and confirm non-conforming facts. Apply intuition to choose whether to pursue alternative truths or to continue to refine present model. And so on.