Hyper-Environments

(by Dlanorrenrag*)
Observer Collapsing Of Ambiguous Flux:

Apart from arbitrary choice of reference or perspective, no clear division-in-itself avails among mathematically measurable forms or representations of “things.” Rather, mathematically and statistically measurable relations inter-permeate, overlap, and flux among all of the physics with which we interact.

Yet, various levels and degrees of forms and patterns seem to recognize, fit, key, and interact with one another. That is, a contextually sympathetic observer would perceive certain patterns as affecting each other somewhat holistically, as patterns --- even though, in themselves, such patterns, as patterns, have no self identity.

Depending upon anthropic context, Something about our relations seems inclined to avail experiences of perspectives of patterns of mathematically computational reactivity and/or sensitivity. Something seems to avail the Reading by perspectives of patterns within such perspectives’ vicinity, as well as the Readability of patterns by perspectives within such patterns’ vicinity. It is as though each entire holographic context were communicating between two aspects (the Reading and the Readability) of itself.

Little in mathematics would seem to limit the morphological potential of such cross-forms of evolutionary computation. As computer assisted skills in computation continue to increase exponentially, shall we not soon have HYPER-ENVIRONMENTS, ambiguously poised to anticipate and/or serve the desires and whims of program-favored personages? Are entire holographies evolving towards serving superior focus levels of sentience?

Shall an increasingly mathematical organization of computational information bring otherwise ambiguous cause and effect to depend ever more upon observers?

Ask and ye shall receive!

****

Compare Asimov's notion, in Foundation's Edge, of the form of a door for expressing capacity, as door, to be "happy."
Note: Once a holography has morphed to the point of producing, say, a frog, such frog will have evolved so as to Read much the same of patterns as would we, and such holography will have evolved so as relatively soon to be amenable of producing such patterns of Read-ability to such as us. That is, the potential for our formation would be implicated in the same holography that formed the frog, such that, eventually, such holography would be “happy” to in-form us.

****

NOTE: For Readable patterns to seek patterns to Read them, it would seem that they must shut out empathy for such other holographies or worlds of patterns as are beyond their Readability. Thus, synchronicity among parallel worlds, each oblivious to the patterns of the others, may argue against their inter-empathy. However, such parallel synchronicity does not argue against any particular holography’s intra-empathy or against intuition of an ultimate Source of empathetic Will. Synchronicity suggests coordination, not cause and effect. That is, mere happenstance, such as tripping over a vase, as by a being in a parallel world, does not implicate causation in our world.