(by Dlanorrenrag*)
First Entanglement:
Quite Uninformed, Speculative, and "Experimental" Musing:
In the first sequence of our common Big Bang, all masses and bodies were entangled in a single point, in respect of the universal pilot wave or field of the Author of our existence.
All information of our universe in respect of such chronologically first sequence was represented and stored in such point.
All information was so perfectly harmonious, resonant, and symmetrical that no principle of exclusion precluded all such information from occupying the same state as represented by the same point.
However long such point may have been stable and symmetrical before it became unstable and asymmetrical is not measurable to mortal empiricism.
Regardless, once such point became unstable, information stored “within” it became active, triggering a principle of exclusion, such that information represented in such point-particle exploded, to fill its field in every subsequent sequence.
Early breaks in the symmetry of such point-particle would not represent so much expression of information as in such breaks as snowballed thereafter.
Recording of patterns of information of such early sequences would not be preserved or perceived as taking so much “time.” Until breaks became sufficient to allow information to be measurably recorded in physical representations, any subsequent examination would reveal such previous breaks as seeming to occur within a ridiculously small amount of “time.”
If each break occurred as a split, to a split, to a split, and so on, like a cell subdividing in super-symmetry, then, depending upon the level of each measurement of a split, each such split may be represented in a polarized, translatable, previously entangled twin. If so, there may still be a galaxy somewhere in space-time that is much like our own.
Such super-symmetry may extend even to the most elementary particles. An elementary particle cannot split further. But, it may share an entangled state with a like particle of like angular momentum (spin). Were such an entanglement then to split, each such particle may be said to be polarized with its twin.
During such polarization, what happens to the spin of one among such a pair would necessarily happen to the other, synchronously, regardless of separation in space.
How long would such polarization last? What could end it?
Could such “spooky action at a distance” be used to convey information faster than the speed of light?
Friday, November 16, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment