Ineffable Intuition

(by Dlanorrenrag*)

Ineffable Intuition:

Could there be any direction in time, were there no direction in thermodynamic expansion?
At any level, could consciousness from the whole of our universe be exhibited, were there no fundamental direction in patterns among such parts as may be thought to comprise our universe?

Well, we do not enjoy experiences at the level of such whole, and we have no adequate model by which to test or convert it, in respect of completeness, consistency, or coherency.
We cannot subject any notion of such whole, in itself, to empirical testing.
We cannot map such whole, to correlate or coordinate it to any precise model.

We cannot empirically falsify that of which may consist the reality of such whole (within which we find ourselves).

We cannot empirically falsify whether such whole may consist of a collection of interacting, ultimate, physical particles and forces.
As to ultimate particles, we cannot prove that there is "any there, there."

We cannot empirically falsify whether such particles and forces as may manifest to us may themselves be manifestations, in place or respect of some ultimate thing or things that are ineffable to empiricism, but, perhaps, not necessarily beyond empathetic, yet unverifiable, intuition.

So, may that which we translate as empirical experience be modeled, consistently, to manifest in association with an imagining of interactions among formless (i.e., having value, digitally, only as "on" or "off" numerical placeholders) units of space, being quanticized in interrelating expression of mathematical functions or placeholders of information?

May some Imagination be conducting a grand mental exercise, wherewith each unit of space is assigned limits of interaction under one Formula that applies in kind to every formless unit of space?

May physics consist in mental construction by a superior Mathematician?
Is there a superior Consciousness, of which each of us — in common, harmonious, holographic vibration — constitutes a representative, empathetic, manifestation?

Were any such model or formula shown amenable (at least as well as any other model) of being correlated with a consistent mathematics, would such a showing lend intuitive support to the model’s pertinence?

Could any such formula, in itself, constitute "a sort of Higgs Boson," by which is made possible all manifestations of mass?

Or, could any such model have pertinence only for inspiring or justifying moral empathy?

Eventually, may we measure our empirical reality as consisting with formless units of digitally imbued space, each unit having capacity to receive, interpret, respond to, and send synchronous bursts of mathematically coded, digital information?

May we "reasonably" intuit that our spiritual reality consists in "one space of Consciousness," which by-produces our experiences or perspectives of consciousness in association with complex expressions of disparate, empirically formless, units of information-synchronizing space?

May God’s imagination touch all of us in instantaneous "nowness"?

Does any fan of Occam have a simpler model --- which hinders neither and respects both ---empirical science and moral intuition?